| 韩国语和汉语各自属于分歧的语系,它们之间必定存在诸多差别。作为黏着语的韩国语重要运用衔接词尾和助词来衔接句子,许多时刻一个衔接词尾依据语境的分歧可以说明成完整分歧的寄义。而作为孤立语的汉语则与韩国语分歧,是经由过程联系关系词语和语序来衔接句子,完成句子寄义。这类说话间的差别和母语的作用给说话进修者在进修韩国语的进程中形成必定的艰苦。“(?)”作为具有多重语义的衔接词尾,自己有着极端庞杂的句法特点,所以成为说话进修者在韩国语进修进程中的难点。本研究斟酌韩国语进修的现状,以具有多重语义功效的韩国语衔接词尾“(?)”和与其绝对应的汉语表示为研究对象,对它们的语义功效和句法制约停止商量。然后运用比较说话学的办法,从语义功效和句法特点角度对韩国语衔接词尾“(?)”和与其绝对应的汉语表示停止比较,找出它们之间存在的配合点和差别。本文共由6个部门构成。第一章为序论,重要引见论文的研究目标、整顿后人的研究结果、提出本文的研究办法和内容组成。经由过程商量先行研究,发明现有研究结果多着重于对衔接词尾“(?)”停止语法特点方面和教导计划角度的研讨,对于韩中比较的研究却很少。第二章至第五章重要对韩国语衔接词尾“(?)”及其对应汉语表示的语法特点从语义功效和句法特点角度停止剖析。语义功效重要以衔接词尾“(?)”所具有的承接、转机、因果和递进等四个语义为中间睁开剖析。句法特点重要从句型制约、谓语制约、主语分歧制约、主语人称制约和否认法制约等五个角度停止剖析。详细内容以下：第二章商量韩国语表承接关系衔接词尾“(?)”及其对应的汉语表示“接着”“然后”的语义功效及句法制约,然落后行比较。第三章商量韩国语表转机关系衔接词尾“(?)”及其对应的汉语表示“然则”、“却”的语义功效及语法制约,然落后行比较。第四章商量韩国语表因果关系衔接词尾“(?)”及其对应的汉语表示“所以”、“成果”的语义功效及句法制约,然落后行比较。第五章商量韩国语表递进关系衔接词尾“(?)”及其对应的汉语表示“不只…也…”、“不只…还…”的语义功效及句法制约,然落后行比较。第六章为结论,整顿本文所研究重要内容,提出研究价值,并提出论文存在的缺乏及将来研究课题。研究者愿望此研究能为进修韩语的中国人准确地进修并运用“(?)”这一语法供给赞助,也为韩国语教材的编纂供给一些参考。有干系接词尾“(?)”和终结词尾“(?)”的研究和详细教导计划的提出在此研究中未触及,往后将在本研究的基本上持续睁开。 Abstract: Korean and Chinese respectively belong to different language families, there must be a lot of difference between them. As an agglutinative language. Korean important application of cohesion suffix and auxiliary to sentence cohesion and many times a cohesive suffix on the basis of context differences can shows a completely different meaning. And as isolated language Chinese is disagreement with Korean is via the connection between words and word order to sentence cohesion and complete the sentence meaning. The impact of such talk to the difference between mother tongue to speak Korean learners in the learning process of formation must be hard. "(?)" as a multiple semantic cohesive suffix, their extreme complex syntactic features, so a language learners in language learning difficulties in the process. This study considers the Korean language learning situation to have multiple semantic effect of Korean cohesive suffix "(?)" and their absolute should Chinese says as the research object, to their semantic function and syntax about stop to discuss. Is then applied to compare learning to speak the way, from the perspective of semantic function and syntactic features of Korean cohesive suffix "(?)", and the corresponding Chinese said, find out the existing between them in common and difference. This paper consists of 6 parts. The first chapter is a preface, important introduced the research goal, rectify the descendants of the research results, put forward this research method and content. Through discussing the first research and invention of existing research results mainly to the cohesive suffix "(?)" stop grammatical features and teaching plan view of about Korean and Chinese comparative research rarely. The second chapter to the fifth chapter, the important of Korean cohesive suffix "(?)" and the corresponding Chinese grammatical features from the perspective of semantic function and syntactic features analysis. Semantic functions important to link up with the suffix "(?)" has undertake, transferring, causal and progressive four semantic intermediate open analysis. It is important to analyze the syntactic features from five aspects, such as sentence patterns, predicate control, subject differences, subject person control and denial of the legal system. With the following contents: the second chapter discuss Korean table to undertake joint ending? "And the corresponding Chinese said" then "" and "semantic functions and syntax about, although the fall was performed to compare. The third chapter discuss the Korean table transfer relationship between cohesive suffix "(?)" and the corresponding Chinese said "however", "but" the semantic function and grammatical constraints. However, using comparative. The fourth chapter discuss the Korean table causal connection suffix "(?)" and the corresponding Chinese said "so", "achievement" of the semantic functions and syntax about, although fall after comparison. The fifth chapter discuss the relation between Korean table progressive suffix "(?)" and its corresponding Chinese said "not only... Also..." , "not only... Also..." The semantic functions of the semantic functions and the sentence legal system, and then compare. The sixth chapter is the conclusion, rectify the important content of this article, put forward the research value, and put forward the lack of the paper and future research topics. Researchers hope this research can for Chinese people to learn Korean accurately learning and application "(?)" the grammar to provide assistance, for Korean language textbooks compilation to provide some reference. Have relations connected with Suffix "(?)" and termination "(?)" research and detailed teaching plan proposed in this study did not touch, later will be in the study of continuous open. 目录: |
