作 者：邓芳丽[1] 张健[1] 菅田勝也[2] DENG Fang - li, ZHANG Jian（ The First Peopleg Hospital of Chenzhou City, Chenzhou 423000） Kanda Katsuya（ Tokyo university school of medicine, Tokyo 113 - 0033 ） 机构地区：[1]湖南省郴州市第一人民医院,郴州市423000 [2]东京学院医学部 出 处：《护理实践与探讨》2017年第4期3-5,共3页Attend to Practice and Research 摘 要：目的：检验“护士工作环境量表”中文版的信度和效度。措施：将日语版的“护士工作环境量表”编译成中文,邀请570名护士填写量表,使用主成因略论法对量表的信度和效度进行检验。结果：“护士工作环境量表”中文版总的Cronbach＇sα系数为0.926,折半信度为0.833。因子略论抽出5个,解释了总方差的62.461%,所有条目的因子负荷均大于0.4。各因子的Cronbach＇sα系数为0.665~0.943,折半信度在0.531~0.892之间。根据专家评价,各条目的内容效度均大于0.8,内容效度指数平均值为0.92。结论：“护士工作环境量表”中文版具有较好的信度和效度,可用于测量我国护士工作环境的状况。Objective： To investigate＂ the nurse work environment scale＂ Chinese version reliability and validity. Methods ： The Japanese version of ＂Nurses working environment scale＂ translated into Chinese, invited 570 nurses to fill the scale, using the primary analysis of the causes of reliability and validity was tested. Results： Nurses＇work environment scale Chinese version of the overall Cronbach＇s α coefficient was 0.926, split - half reliability was 0. 833. Factor analysis extracted five, explaining 62. 461% of the total variance, the load factor greater than 0.4 for all entries. Cronbach ＇sα coefficient of each factor was 0. 665 - 0. 943, split - half reliability between 0.531 - 0.892. According to expert evaluations, the content validity of each item was greater than 0.8, content validity index average of 0.92. Conclusion： ＂Nurses working environment scale＂ Chinese version has good reliability and validity, and can be used to measure the status of nurses＇work environment. 关 键 词：护士 工作环境 信度 效度 分 类 号：R192.6[医药卫生—卫生事业管理;医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学] ，日语毕业论文，日语论文 |
