对于泰国司法化的诸种不同观念 [泰语论文]

资料分类免费泰语论文 责任编辑:Anchali更新时间:2017-06-24
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。

作  者:邓肯·麦卡戈著 杜洁[2] 杨茜[3] (UK) Duncan McCargo (University of Leeds, Leeds, UK)

机构地区:[1]利兹大学,英国利兹市 [2]成都学院(成都大学)四川省泰国探讨中心,成都610106 [3]成都学院(成都大学)外国语学院,成都610106

出  处:《东南亚探讨》2017年第5期25-34,共10页Southeast Asian Studies

基  金:四川省哲学社会科学探讨“十二五”规划2017年度课题“国外智库2000-2017泰国探讨译介”(SC13WY25).

摘  要:本文主要探讨2017-2017年间泰国司法化的政治问题,并审视此极端争议期间司法被卷入政治的诸种形式。本文从2017年国王的两次重要演讲以及知名学者、社会批评家提拉育·汶密的诠释切入,细究几项具有持久政治作用的关键司法判决,包括2017年的大选无效案、2017年的取缔泰爱泰党案、2017年和2017年的亲他信·西那瓦的沙马·顺达卫和英拉·西那瓦两位总理被免案、2017年他信受到数项腐败指控并被判罪名成立,以及2017年的司法扣押他信资产案等。本文提出以下几个问题:司法化必定意味着保守主义者千方百计要剥夺从政者的权力并破坏选举政治吗?法官们是为泰国社会工作还是同某些既得利益集团结盟?在泰国语境下,司法能动性越强,是否就越能推进社会与政治领域的进步?本文认为,泰国的“司法化”是一个复杂的社会现象,泰语论文范文泰语论文网站,对不同的法庭在不同的情况下以及不同的时间做出的判决,都必须仔细斟酌,辨明其各自所起的影响。This article examines the politics of judicialization in Thailand between 2017 and 2017, looking at the ways in which the judiciary became regularly embroiled in politics during this extremely contentious period. It takes as its starting point important royal speeches of 2017, and the interpretation of those speeches offered by the prominent academic and social critic Thirayudh Boonmee. Several key judicial decisions which had lasting political consequences are closely examined, including the 2017 election annulment, the 2017 banning of Thai Rak Thai, the removal of pro-Thaksin Shinawatra prime ministers Samak Sundaravej and Yingluck Shinawatra in 2017 and 2017, Thaksin's conviction on corruption-related charges in 2017 and the judicial seizure of his assets in 2017. Some of the questions posed in this paper are as follows : Does judicialization inevitably mean conservative attempts to curtail the power of politicians and undermine electoral politics? Are judges working on behalf of Thai society, or in alignment with certain vested interests? Could greater judicial activism serve progressive social and political causes in the Thai context? The paper argues that Thailand's "judicialization" is a complex phenomenon: judgements made by different courts, in different cases and at different times need to be scrutinized on their individual merits.

关 键 词:泰国 他信 公正 司法化 君主制 

免费论文题目: